Overview of the cult's ideology
David John Carter, Nov. 1995
Here is a personal interpretation of some of the teachings of the
Church of Scientology. I have included some experiences from my years
in the `church' which I hope you find interesting. Please excuse the
use of abbreviations and acronyms: these terms are commonly used in
Scientology, and a few are essential to an understanding of its
ideology.
Table of Contents
Brief Overview
Broad View
1. People consist of three parts.
2. People are basically good.
3. Removing the reactive mind.
4. The spirit is trapped.
5. Three types of people.
6. Three states of existence.
7. Emotional tone scale.
8. Overts and withholds.
8a. Ethics.
9. Automatic mental processes.
10. Communication.
11. ARC triangle.
12. Psychotics.
13. Accidents and Assists.
14. The 8 Dynamics.
15. Goals Problem Mass.
16. Randomity.
17. Study Techology.
18. Courses and courserooms.
19. The `Tech'.
20. The OT Levels.
21. Initial attraction.
22. Disaffected Scientologists.
Appendix
A. About the Author.
B. Scientology Associations.
C. References used in this essay.
D. Further reading.
Side Trips
In the late 1940s Lafayette Ronald Hubbard (LRH), who
had written some fiction and science fiction stories in the decade
before, left the US Navy and wrote a book called Dianetics: The
Modern Science of Mental Health (known as Book 1). This was published
in 1950 and gained an immediate following. Dianetics centres were set
up around the United States and people began `auditing' each
other. Auditing is the term used to describe the time where two people
sit (usually) in a room and the auditor asks pre-determined questions
(processes) of the other until the desired outcome is reached. The
desired outcome is called the End Phenomenon (EP).
Hubbard lost the rights to Dianetics in the early 1950s and began
a movement which he called Scientology. This was later registered as a
religion and stands as such today in a number of countries. In the mid
1950s he regained the rights to Dianetics and incorporated its
techniques into his Scientology processes. He said "Dianetics
addresses the body. Scientology addresses the spirit." (Ref: HCOB 22
April 1969)
The fundamental concept behind both Dianetics and Scientology
processing is that the mind stores incidents (as images) in a series
of related chains. If something is troubling a person it is because a
similar upsetting incident has previously occurred to that person. If
you find the earlier incident (which has been lost to the conscious
mind) and get the person to look at it, then this can eliminate the
problem. If this doesn't work then there is an earlier incident and so
on. The earliest incident is called `basic on the chain'. The End
Phenomenon would be that the person is no longer troubled by the
incident.
The EP of Dianetics is the `Clear'. The person has no more
incidents in the past to affect him or her in the present. This is
supposed to produce a completely rational human being. Scientology
goes on past this point (although there are many Scientology processes
before the clear state is reached) and deals with the liberation of
the spirit (called OT levels). It is after clear that the entire
concept changes and the processes bear no resemblance to the principle
explained above.
In 1967, to develop and deliver the OT levels, Hubbard set up the
Sea Organisation (S.O.). This is a Scientology organisation run along
navy lines with officers and other ranks who sign a billion year
contract to serve Hubbard and Scientology. Here lies the real power
and wealth of the `church' and it is commanded at present by its CEO
David Miscavige who holds the Scientology rank of Captain.
Hubbard was born in 1911, married three times and officially died
on January 24, 1986.
[ Contents ]
Broad View.
1. People consist of three parts.
"There are three parts of man: thetan, mind, body." (Ref: HCOB 13
Nov 1981)
- Spirit
- Scientologists call this the Thetan. It is the person (you) and
is immortal. It has no existence in the physical universe and so has
no physical universe size, shape or age. Since we are immortal, we
have thus always existed. "The weird idea is that one only lives but
once" (Ref: HCOB 23 April 1969)
- Mind
- Scientologists believe that this has nothing to do with the
brain, which is merely a sort of switchboard for the Thetan to
communicate with the body. They are taught that the mind is simply a
collection of pictures (facsimiles) which are carried around by the
Thetan. These pictures, when they are accessible to the Thetan, form
the analytical mind. When the pictures are hidden from the Thetan,
they can have unpredictable mental, emotional and
physical effects; this is called the reactive mind.
- Body
- The Thetan is, in a sense, trapped in the body. It escapes on the
death of the body and is then forced to return to earth to pick up
another. Scientology is supposedly trying to free the Thetan from this never
ending cycle.
[ Contents ]
2. People are basically good. Irrational thought and
behaviour, along with evil, exist only because of the effects of the
reactive mind.
"It will be found that man is basically good. Only his
aberrations are bad." (Ref: HCOB 23 April 1969)
The reactive mind pictures (called Engrams) are stored in times of
pain and unconsciousness. When pain, along with some degree of
unconsciousness, occurs, it seems that the Thetan decides this is too
awful to be confronted so it places the pictures of the incident in an
area that it cannot access. So the Thetan (the person) `forgets' the
incident but can experience a type of flashback when later circumstances
resemble the ones in the forgotten incident. The reactive mind takes
some control and this can cause the individual to do and say things
and feel emotions which are inappropriate to the real
circumstances. It is a survival mechanism gone wrong.
[ Contents ]
3. Removing the reactive mind pictures makes the
person sane.
"Once the reactive mind is vanquished, the PC is again capable
of his full potential as a being." (Ref: HCOB 17 Oct 1964)
A person who does not have a reactive mind is said to be CLEAR. A
person on the road to clear is called a Preclear (PC).
To remove the reactive mind, the practitioner (called an Auditor),
simply gets the PC to talk his way through whatever incident has been
blocked from his conscious thought. Auditors use an E-Meter to help
the PC find these incidents.
The E-Meter is a piece of equipment that measures the resistance
in a body. The theory is that the pictures in the mind have a certain
amount of mass and electrical charge, as the person looks at a picture
it causes the mass to come closer to the body and so increases the
overall resistance associated with the body. The person keeps looking
at the picture and eventually s/he can see it all at which time the
mass disperses and discharges (which is indicated on the meter) and it
cannot cause any more unfavourable effects.
This was the basis of Dianetics which Hubbard devised in the late
1940's.
Hubbard lost the rights to Dianetics in the Early 1950's and had
to change tack. He devised a whole encyclopaedia of processes to help
people get to clear and beyond, and began his new religion called
Scientology.
He eventually regained control of Dianetics and developed New Era
Dianetics (NED) to run in conjunction with Scientology.
[ Contents ]
4. The spirit has degenerated into something that is
trapped in a body and, in fact, thinks it is a body.
This is a basic belief of Scientology and Hubbard devised the OT
(Operating Thetan) levels to take the Thetan back to its native
state. (Able to operate without the need of a body.) These levels are
above the state of clear. Scientology is in effect, offering a
god-like state to anyone who can travel the whole path.
The path is called `The Bridge to Total Freedom'. This is a
multi-level chart of considerable length and expense. The Bridge is
two sided, `processing' and `training', and to really be successful,
it is said, one must walk up both sides. This then requires years of
processing (Auditing) and even more years of training (to be an
auditor and to help one to handle life).
[ Contents ]
5. The world contains three types of people.
- Suppressive Persons (SP).
- SP's are the treacherous and evil types who are determined to
wreak havoc wherever they can. They destroy everything that is good,
and support everything that is evil. They cannot be helped and have a
terrible effect on others around them, often making their associates
feel inferior. Anyone who opposes Scientology is considered an SP.
These people make up 2.5% of the population which at today's count
would be well over 100 million people. It is my opinion that within
the walls of Scientology the percentage is considerably higher than
2.5%.
- Potential Trouble Sources (PTS).
- People who are closely associated with SP's can be made to feel
worthless and are often ill. However there is an even more noticeable
side-effect of this relationship, the PTS person can take on the
attributes of the SP and can cause considerable trouble for others
(mainly Scientology). If, in the company of a particular person, one
makes mistakes, acts stupidly, feels inferior or becomes ill, then one
is said to be PTS to that individual. This can be due to the fact
that the individual is an SP or reminds the PTS person of a past SP.
Being PTS to a family member will require action to handle it, which
might mean separation from family. These PTS's make up a further
17.5% of the population. Beings who are very PTS and have been for a
long time are called `Degraded beings'. (Ref: HCOB 22 March 1967)
- Average Person (not a Scientology term).
- Those who do not fall into the above two categories. Which is 80%
of the population. However anyone can become PTS to certain people or
groups. The average person needs help in life and Hubbard said that they are the ones
for which Scientology is meant. The disparaging term for those who
are not Scientologists is Wogs. These people are considered to be not
trying.
[ Contents ]
6. There are three states of existence.
- Isness.
- This state of existence is associated with our understanding of
reality. In order to continue or persist, existence requires an
untruth (Alter-is). The physical universe consists of Matter, Energy,
Space and Time (MEST) and exists because we agree that it exists, and
persists because it contains lies.
- Not-Isness.
- This is a state which is denial of the truth. An attempt to
remove an unwanted state by not looking at it.
- As-Isness.
- This is a state where existence is viewed exactly as it is, with
no lies, at which time it ceases to exist. This is the underlying
theory behind the workability of Dianetics and Scientology. When you
look at something, exactly as it is -- when you `as-is' something --
it ceases to exist and can no longer effect you. In theory, the whole
physical universe could be as-ised.
An interesting aside to this is that you will not find many
Scientologists asking, "How are you feeling?" They usually ask, "How
are you doing?" The reason is that if you ask someone the former
question, they look over their present condition and supposedly as-is
some mass. This would have the effect of reducing their possessions
(or Havingness) and cause them to feel worse.
[ Contents ]
7. People have a chronic emotional state (Tone)
which lies somewhere on the Scientology Tone Scale.
The tone scale is a range of emotional
tones that begins below `body death', but I will deal only with those
above that level. The higher the tone level of the individual, the
more able is that individual.
The tones range through body death, apathy, grief, fear, covert
hostility, hate, anger, antagonism, boredom, contented, mild interest,
conservatism, enthusiasm etc. Tone 0 (zero) to Tone 40. Each has been
given an arbitrary number. A person in a particular tone acts in a
predictable manner. If you are able to spot their tone you can predict
their actions. You can use this to communicate with someone, all you
need to know is that people are unable to communicate at a tone far
above their own level. Spot their tone and adopt a tone a little above
that in order to communicate.
Covert hostility is given the arbitrary number 1.1 (one point one)
and any one who is being sarcastic is described as being 1.1. It a
sort of concealed hatred, supposedly not `uptoned' enough to show
hate.
People travel the tone scale experiencing each and every emotion
in its turn (even if only for a few seconds). For example, a person
moving (because of some external effect) from conservatism to apathy
will spend some time at each of the levels between these two.
People move up and down these tones constantly, but everyone has a
level where they are to be found on most occasions. This is their
chronic tone level and Scientology auditing and training is said to
have the effect of raising the person on the tone scale. (Thus
increasing their ability to communicate and their general well being.)
People can be temporarily brought `up tone' by the simple action
of observing their tone level and addressing them at a slightly higher
level. An example can be shown in dealing with a fearful person. If
you address them at a level of apathy, they will probably join you at
that level (get worse). However if you address them using anger (not
addressed at them, of course, but as their ally) they will most
likely become angry themselves, which is a higher tone than fear and
therefore makes them more able to handle their situation. Anger, is
not a particularly workable tone level but this is an example only.
[ Contents ]
8. People are critical of others because of what
they have done to those others.
Let's assume a hypothetical situation exists where Jim constantly
criticises Mary.
Conventional thought is that Jim dislikes Mary because Mary is an
idiot or has done something to Jim. Scientology teaches that the
opposite is true; Jim dislikes Mary because of what Jim has done to
Mary.
It is known as the `Overt-Motivator' sequence (The overt occurs
before the reason for it). It goes something like this, Jim does
something hurtful (an overt) to Mary. Having committed the overt, Jim
has to justify it (make it okay).
Jim will belittle Mary in the eyes of others to make her seem
worthless (the motivator). He will then be convinced, whether or not
Mary eventually does something (also a motivator), that she deserved
the overt as some sort of retribution. This gives approval to continue
to commit overts on Mary.
"When someone has committed an overt, he or she has to claim the
existence of motivators." (Ref: HCOB 7 Sep 1964). Simply put, this
means that people who dislike and criticise you have done something to
you.
A person who commits an overt will keep it quiet (withhold it).
He or she is said to have a withhold. Withholds cause people to
individuate (separate away from the group).
This is bad enough. But when a third person does or says
something that makes the person wonder whether or not they know about
the withhold, then it becomes the very dangerous `missed withhold'.
Missed withholds may cause the person to become irrational or even
psychotic, he's just not sure whether you know!
To be overly critical of something indicates overts against that
thing. I well remember an incident which happened to me at an Org
many years ago, it is an indication of how the `tech' can be misused.
I had paid some money for a service or something and a few weeks later
I was approached by the Executive Director (ED) of the Org asking me
if I had paid the sum or not. I stated that I had and made the point
that if someone pays for something, the Org should be sure to record
the fact. The ED immediately went on the attack and said that I was
being critical (thus accusing me of having overts against the Org.).
This is just one instance of how incompetence can be justified and how
true is the old maxim `a little knowledge can be dangerous'.
Fortunately I knew of a Hubbard reference that didn't condemn all
criticism (Ref: HCOB 21 Jan 1960). Fighting `tech' with `tech' can
help you survive in Scientology.
The word, Motivator, is also used to explain the cause of mishaps.
For example if something goes wrong then you have done something (the
motivator) to cause it. (You pulled it in.).
A point that may be of interest to those on the Internet who are
becoming a problem for Scientology, ars for instance, Hubbard said
"One cannot have a problem without overts and withholds against the
people involved in it..." (Ref: HCOB 9 Nov 1961). I wonder what they
have done to you? Well I'm sure you could tell me and that is
Scientology's motivator.
[ Contents ]
8a. Ethics.
The overt-motivator sequence is the underlying theory behind
Scientology's Ethics section handling of dissatisfied Scientologists.
An Ethics officer is trained to find out what the person has done to
cause them to be upset with Scientology. The person is told to `write
up your overts' and is assigned an ethics condition, under which
they must carry out specific tasks in order to progress up to a normal
or better condition.
A quote from the excellent book L. Ron Hubbard: Messiah or
Madman by Corydon and Hubbard Jr., succinctly spells out the
thinking of the `church'. "To be a critic of the church or its
founder is to be insane. Simple as that."
An auditor trained in `security checking' can give the person an
HCO confessional, which is an ethics action in an auditing session.
Under normal conditions an auditing session is `confidential', however
anything divulged in an HCO confessional can be used in evidence
against the person.
Since Scientology is thought to be the only true hope for the
individual, anyone who is opposed to it must have committed overts
against it and will not be able to function as a true Scientologist
until they have been honest and admitted to all of their overts.
People leaving Scientology without doing this are said to `blow'
(leave unexpectedly). They are given a short period in which to
return, after which if they remain disaffected, they are branded as
SPs. This carries with it the loss of all rights and if they then
attack the `church', by suing, going to the press or any other way,
they are considered `fair game' for any retribution.
[ Contents ]
9. People set up automatic mental processes
(Circuits) to carry out actions that they find tedious or difficult.
A classical example of this is the person who drives a car and
changes gear without conscious thought (most of us). Circuits or
habits are set up when a person is unwilling to duplicate.
These can be very useful, but if the circuit is based on some
reactive mind information, it can be dangerous, absurd and actually
insane.
One type of circuit is set up so as to make others wrong and
justify the actions of the person. This is called a Service Facsimile
and is based on a thought, such as `I know best'. It allows the
person to do or say things without having to examine the truth, which
if done may prove the person to be wrong.
Being wrong is seen as a non-survival action and since Hubbard
decreed that `Survival' was the motivation for our existence, (Ref:
HCOB 27 Jul 1960) these circuits are designed to help us survive.
Unfortunately, since they are based on an insane thought, they can
have the opposite effect.
[ Contents ]
10. Communication has a formula.
The formula for communication is Cause-Distance-Effect, with
intention and attention at both cause and effect and duplication with
understanding at effect of what emanated from cause. If any of these
elements are missing then complete communication does not take place.
(Ref: HCOB 27 April 1971)
If a person has no attention on the source of the information or
has no intention of receiving it then that person is not able (or
doesn't wish to) duplicate the message. The message can, under these
circumstances, be misduplicated and so misunderstood or not arrive at
all.
A communication particle can be a thought or an object. (Throwing
a ball to someone is a form of communication.).
To end a communication cycle, the originator must be acknowledged.
Hubbard considered communication to be the most powerful force in
dealing with the reactive mind. "Increasing communication with the
aberration will eventually handle it." (Ref: SHSBC-298).
[ Contents ]
11. Understanding consists of Affinity (affection),
Reality (agreement) and Communication.
A person who is upset with someone has had a breakdown in one or
more of these three points. It is called an ARC break. Identifying
the outpoint can clear away the upset. Friendliness greeted by no
answer is an indication of an ARC break.
A Thetan will dream up ARC breaks to take his mind off a Present
time problem. (Ref: HCOB 20 Aug 1958)
For an ARC break to occur there must have been ARC
(friendship/understanding) in the first place.
Increasing one will increase the others; e.g., increasing
Communication with someone will increase Affinity for the person and
Reality or agreement with them, thereby increasing understanding.
Conversely, decreasing one will decrease the others.
[ Contents ]
12. Psychotics.
Psychotics are people who are stuck in a past incident and do not
have enough attention units in the present time (PT) to act
rationally. If they are auditable you can use "Point out something
that is really real to you." (Ref: SHSBC-15), as a command to bring
them into PT.
In a later bulletin Hubbard stated "All persons who have been too
much around a bad military or who have had military fathers are very
likely to be subject to a derangement." (Ref: HCOB 25 Aug 1960).
Psychosis and neurosis are caused by too much restimulation from
the environment, so anything which reduces the restimulation is
effective. "Thus, under threat, he goes out of present time." (Ref:
HCOB 8 Jan 1969)
Rest, isolation from the former environment, mild exercise and the
provision of a safe environment are the first treatments. (Ref: HCOB
11 Dec 1964)
Simply saying "Come up to present time" can sometimes bring a
psychotic out of the incident.
[ Contents ]
13. Accidents and Assists.
An `assist' is an auditing action that is designed to get the
Thetan into communication with the body; and in so doing, allow a more
rapid recovery. (Ref: HCOB 21 Oct 1971)
There are a number of assists. The Touch Assist sees the auditor
touching, over and over again, various parts of the PC's body. The
Nerve Assist is a massage-like action; and the Contact Assist gets the
person to touch the hurt body part against the object that caused the
damage.
There are also numerous subjective processes designed to help with
accidents and to increase the Thetan's communication with the body
part. They also serve to bring the PC out of the incident and into
PT.
A cold may be cleared up by asking, "Who has left you in the last
few days?" (Ref: SHSBC-268) and there is a "bring back to life assist"
as described in a Bulletin of that name. (Ref: HCOB 8 Apr 1988) It
consists basically of shaking the body and demanding that the Thetan
return.
[ Contents ]
14. The Dynamics.
There are eight `dynamics' in Scientology:
- Self.
- Sex and family.
- Group.
- Mankind.
- Animals and plants.
- Physical universe.
- Spirit.
- God.
It is the desire to survive as or through these dynamics that is
the driving force of the Thetan.
The eighth dynamic (also known as `infinity') is not addressed by
Scientology. In fact Hubbard did not believe in the existence of God.
He proclaimed "...prayers going up to a myth..." (Ref: Taped lecture:
"Scientology and effective knowledge.")
An example of the use of the dynamics: If a Scientologist is
having an affair with another, he or she is said to be `out 2D'.
Meaning that the second dynamic is not as it should be. This is
usually handled in Ethics section and it can lead to an SO member
being severely punished.
A person can be aberrated (deviation from what is usual) on any or
all dynamics. So to be truly sane one must be sane on all dynamics.
[ Contents ]
15. Goals Problem Mass (GPM)
The mind contains pictures (facsimiles) of events, which under
normal circumstances are `filed' in chains of similar incidents by
time. These pictures contain tiny amounts of mental mass and are
usually very ordered. If you get a picture of (think of) a childhood
event, you know where it fits on your time track.
A particular type of mental mass, called a `ridge', is formed when
a goal is thwarted by a problem. Ridges normally are filed in their
correct position in time with relation to other events. However, the
mind can become confused where there are a number of similar
frustrated goals and the pictures can become jumbled up in a spherical
mass, like a pile of film which has run off a reel.
When the dates in a chain of pictures become confused in this way,
the resulting bewildering mass is called a GPM. These are not `this
lifetime' problems, but are actually made up from past existences.
(Ref: HCOB 17 Jan 1962). There can be actual GPM's and Implanted
GPM's. Something the PC wanted to do is an actual GPM, whereas
something that someone else tried to make him do would be an Implant
GPM. (Ref: SHSBC-361)
These GPM's, because the mind cannot separate them out and date
them correctly, can cause physical and emotional problems in present
time for the PC. "The basis of the reactive mind is the actual Goals
Problem Masses." (Ref: HCOB 17 Oct 1964)
[ Contents ]
16. Randomity.
Randomity is a word used to describe the state of activity in an
area. Where a person is bored because there is insufficient activity
to satisfy his or her needs then the person is said to have minus
randomity. Too much activity for comfort is called plus randomity and
just the right amount is given the term optimum randomity. It is
basically a consideration of motion.
A person who can comfortably tolerate various degrees of activity
would have a broad area of optimum randomity. If a person is unable
to tolerate plus and minus randomity, that person tends to go on
`automatic' when it occurs. Hubbard coined the word `automaticity' to
describe this state and it means basically that the person is not
consciously deciding his or her actions. (Ref: Abil Oct 1956) The
actions are being determined by a `circuit', not the person. So the
person, in a sense, is unable to face up to (confront) the activity
and so cannot stay in it's vicinity (mentally). Since "All power
depends upon the ability to hold a location in space" (Ref: HCOB 2 Jun
1971), increasing the person's tolerance of motion, rehabilitates the
ability of the person.
[ Contents ]
17. Study tech.
If you don't understand something that you are reading, it's not
because the concept is too difficult to grasp. It's because the
passage contains words that you don't understand or for which you have
the wrong definition. Finding those words and defining them with a
dictionary (word clearing) will enable you to understand the concept.
People who have passed a `misunderstood word' (MU) will show
telltale signs. They may become sleepy, disinterested, or irritable
and will not understand the paragraphs written after the MU.
If the object being studied is not available for the student to
examine (called lack of mass) this can cause problems as well. This can be
overcome by using anything at all (clay, bits of wood, etc) to
represent the object and so supply some `physical universe' mass.
Those who were with Hubbard at the time that he `discovered' study
technology say that he was extremely excited about this
`breakthrough'. My thinking is that he was excited because he had
actually found something that may have been of some use.
There seems to be some real value to this, but unfortunately like
most other things in Scientology it has been developed to such an
absurd degree and has become so all consuming as to be almost
unworkable.
He said that "Stupidity is the effect of misunderstood words."
(Ref: HCOB 4 Sep 1971). It became a `court of ethics' offense to
fail to clarify words not understood. (Ref: HCOB 10 Jan 1977)
[ Contents ]
18. Courses.
There are no `teachers' or `instructors' in Scientology. All
courses have a `supervisor'. The supervisor's function is to monitor
the students as they study the Bulletins etc, watching for telltale
signs of having passed an MU, or having a `lack of mass'. Supervisors
check out students' knowledge of the course by asking for definitions
of words and getting the student to demonstrate an ability to apply
the knowledge of the course.
There are numerous courses available, from basic courses in
communication through personal development all the way up to advanced
courses for Technical people (auditors) and Administration staff.
[ Contents ]
19. The `Tech'
`Tech' is short for technology. The term is used to encompass
practically everything that Hubbard wrote. He is seen as the `Source'
of all the tech of Scientology and no one must alter this tech in any
way. It must be studied, drilled (practiced) and used exactly as it
is written. Hubbard wrote tech for Auditing procedures and
Administrative procedures. Both are sacrosanct.
Hubbard once said, "If you follow too closely any rules, it
becomes a simple Simon idiocy." (Ref: HCOPL 17 Sep 1962) Nonetheless,
he demanded that Scientologists do just that.
This causes some of the most horrific arguments when people
interpret the tech in different ways. No one is allowed to tell
anyone else what the tech means (called verbal tech), so each person
reads it from their own viewpoint. Much of the tech is taken word
for word from Hubbard's lectures, where he would talk on a subject for
40 minutes or so and was seen to contradict himself on a number of
occasions. No editing was allowed and so the contradictions stand.
An auditor may read and drill a particular auditing process and
then go into session and use it on a pre-clear. Afterwards, the
session is written up and checked over by a case supervisor (C/S). If
the case supervisor believes that the auditor ran the process
incorrectly, the auditor will be sent to re-study the appropriate
bulletins on the process. If this is not the first time, the auditor
may be forced to restudy the entire course.
Where two bulletins contradict, many people will simply accept
what the case supervisor says and do it in a way that satisfies the
C/S. This is fine until the auditor gets a different C/S who
interprets the procedure the original way and gets the auditor to
again restudy it. I have seen auditors who are trying their best,
weeping in frustration over this on a number of occasions.
[ Contents ]
20. The OT levels.
To this date eight levels of OT processing have been released to
Scientologists. The `Bridge' records fifteen.
OT I through OT VIII are said to be `negative gain' levels. That
is, they are removing the things that limit the persons OT abilities.
OT IX and above are known as positive gain levels and are assumed
to increase the OT abilities of the individual. None of these look
like being released for a long time.
It is the materials of the OT levels which cause the most upset
within and without the `church'. Scientology lawyers are quick to act
in any case where these materials are presented for public scrutiny.
Most non-Scientologists, when first reading this gibberish are
incredulous and cannot understand how anyone could believe it has
veracity. In my opinion, it is this reaction which worries the
`church', not the breaking of copyright. After all, who is going to
pay thousands of dollars for information they can get freely from
elsewhere, and which they are not impressed with at any rate? Mind
you, you are not just paying for the information, but also for the
techniques to supposedly handle the auditing of this information.
[ Contents ]
21. Initial attraction.
Like all religions and cults, Scientology offers answers and a
purpose. It engenders a community type relationship where one is made
to feel part of the group. A common enemy is seen to exist
(Psychiatrists and other vested interest groups) and protection from
them reinforces the need to support the group. Of course one will
hear about the former members who are persecuted by the `church', but
one can dismiss this with thoughts such as:
"They must have done terrible things to deserve that treatment," or
"They are obviously SPs," or
"It would never happen to me."
Scientology differs from most accepted religions in that it
proclaims that human beings can become God-like. It teaches that we
were all-powerful (but inexperienced) at some time in the past, and
Scientology is just helping to get us back to that state. This is
very attractive to a lot of people for a lot of reasons. Consider the
man who is in great fear of death. He is told that at some point in
processing he will leave the body (exteriorise) and so prove that he is a
spirit and will survive body death. This can be a great comfort to
him.
Some who join are `searchers'; they have been looking for answers
all their lives. These people have tried orthodox religion,
meditation, drugs, hypnotism, other cults and anything that might help
them to understand what life is all about and what happens at death.
They are looking for answers and usually have no intention of becoming
`attached' to Scientology, but it happens nevertheless. (Sans the
drugs, this is me.)
Greed also plays its part. Some celebrities and those who have
been nurtured to the point of arrogance and who come to believe in
their divine right to receive everything that they desire, are of
course reassured by the teachings. (They probably already think that
they are God or at least God-like.) Some people join, thinking that
this is a great scam and they want to be in on it. Also the `church'
staff are well trained in handling people who wish to leave and they
are also trained in hard sell tactics, which goes a long way to
explain the vast wealth of the `church'. Members are warned of the
dire consequences of leaving the `church' -- once aboard you MUST go
the whole route. This can be very intimidating.
An effort is made in initial interviews to find the newcomers'
`Ruin', which is the matter about which the person is most concerned
in life. Whatever it may be, it is pointed out that Scientology can
help to resolve the problem. Scientology has the answer and it is put
forward as the only way out of the situation.
Hubbard also made a statement that "...mystery sticks a
Thetan...." This means that people will hang around due to curiosity
to find out what is coming up next. So of course members often
speculate about the OT levels (which are confidential) and are willing
to do anything asked of them, so as to not jeopardise the chance of
getting their OT levels. They `know', of course, that they have to
wait and do it properly or it could kill them; people have been on
staff for 20 years and not even made it to clear! This of course
assumes that there is such a state.
Hubbard said that "Book 1 clear is a `this lifetime' clear" (Ref:
SHSBC-121), which infers that to be really clear one has to look all
the way back through past existences (called going whole track). Of course none of today's
'clears' possess a portion of the abilities claimed for them in Book 1, but that is
another story.
[ Contents ]
22. Disaffected Scientologists.
People who leave Scientology, after having spent some time with
the organisation, often state that they have no quarrel with many of
its tenets. This attitude tends to 'wear off' as they return to a normal life in the
real world and as they objectively realise the adverse effects.
Nevertheless, some of the teachings (especially up to clear) seem to contain a
degree of commonsense and can be useful in helping to understand why
people react in the ways that they do.
It was, after all, these ideas which attracted them to Scientology
in the first place. However, many found the attitude of their fellow
Scientologists to be stifling of originality and producing very
depressing and unpleasant working conditions.
This is not restricted to Scientologists who have joined staff,
but they are the ones who have most often experienced at first hand,
the offensive and bad tempered treatment handed out by the senior
ranks. These are the ones who have worked for 16 hours a day, seven
days a week, survived on beans and rice and slept in dingy dormitories
for a few precious hours a day. Even after showing this dedication
they are treated as less than animals. If one were to pick a tone
scale emotion for most Sea Org staff it would have to be `anger' and a
lot are in `apathy'; if you have ever worked with angry people you may
have some idea of the conditions experienced by Scientology staff
members. (Some former members have left because of this and formed
their own similar organisations. They are given the term `squirrels'
and are a target of Scientologists).
Many former Sea Org and class V Org staff (the small Orgs in
cities and towns) are confused as to how a so-called `sane' group of
people could act with such arrogance and belittling anger. Perhaps
the Organisation has been almost completely infiltrated by SP's or
maybe the overts and withholds of this group are so numerous as to be
un-confrontable.
Poor food and lack of sleep obviously play a part in this and it
is fascinating to read Hubbard's booklet `The way to happiness' if
just to note how much of its philosophy is denied to Sea Org members.
As well though, a large amount of vitriol is leveled at
non-Scientologists. Even the finest individuals are considered `wogs'
who are `not even trying.' One is tempted to use the `tech' of the
overt-motivator to ask "What have you done to non-Scientologists?"
Or of Hubbard himself, "What have you done to a psychiatrist?" (Ref:
SHSBC-117). Of course, the answer is there for all to see and is put
forward clearly in a number of books written about Scientology by
former and non-Scientologists. A bibliography can be found at the end
of this essay.
To the `public' (non-staff) Scientologist, who may find the study
demanding and the constant sales pitch for money an irritation, the
general feeling is that it is an interesting and enlightening subject.
No-one believes they are joining a cult and they feel, almost
universally, that this is a misunderstood group of people, simply
trying to better conditions for everyone on the planet. In the early
days a new member is sheltered from the reality of what occurs behind
the scenes and even long time Scientologists often have little
understanding of the outrageous conditions endured by the Sea Org crew
member.
Because of this, many Scientologists tell glowing stories of the
church and what it achieves, although if asked about its public
support services, they would be hard pressed to think of any. What
Scientology does, it does for Scientology and its motivation seems to
come more from the desire to accumulate wealth and protect itself,
than the more often quoted and comfortable `Clear the planet' purpose.
So called `Success Stories' exist in the thousands. These are
written by Scientologists after an auditing session or course of study
and are actually required, before the person can move on to the next
level of auditing or begin another Scientology course. They are
written at a time when the person is feeling good (usually) and can
appear to be an unwavering endorsement for the effectiveness of the
`tech'. In effect they prove nothing; an unsolicited `Success Story'
may have some merit but a compulsory one simply means that the person
did what he or she was told. (Was at effect.)
I believe that the effects of auditing are not lasting. A bit like
taking a drug, feeling good for a while, returning to normal (or
worse) and requiring another fix to feel good again. Hubbard explained
this as the effect of being PTS, and is not how auditing should
be. However that is very convenient for Scientology and not proved to
my satisfaction. The consequence of this is that people have to keep
coming back for more `cleanups' as well as continuing up the bridge as
far as their money (often borrowed) can take them.
The paranoia which sweeps through Orgs is something to be seen and
at some time every Scientologist will experience the wrath of those
convinced that they are trying to destroy the `church'. At these
times even the `tech' will not protect you.
A person who is accused of being an SP will not receive any
support from his or her `friends', regardless of prior record, and can
be the subject of the most humiliating treatment. The highest trained
technical Scientologists (Class XII auditors) can be stripped of their
certificates and forced to re-train on all of the levels, all in the
name of Keeping Scientology Working. Officers and NCO's are regularly
`busted' in rank and the most dedicated can spend time in the
Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF), which separates family members and
can be inhuman in its degradation. Interestingly, Hubbard said that it
is suppressive people who are paranoid. (Ref: SHSBC-430).
This treatment engenders suspicion and certainly doesn't
contribute to a happy, smooth running organisation. On the contrary
no-one trusts anyone else; if you share a thought or feeling with
another, you are liable to find that you are asked to explain a
`knowledge report' which has been written up about your
indiscretion. It really smacks of the Hitler youth group and the
Chinese Red Brigade.
One old-time Scientologist once said to me that Scientology can
offer something that nothing else can, it can offer happiness. I look
back on this and chuckle, because I can honestly say that I am far
happier, now that I have left the `church', than I ever was whilst in
it.
When I accepted the fact that it was over and that Scientology
really could offer me nothing, I was able to get on with life. At 42,
I had to rebuild from scratch because I had lost my home, savings and
superannuation, but the fact is, I was able to. Contrary to what the
`church' teaches, people who leave can survive and do so...Mind you we
are usually much wiser.
So don't bother to come around trying to sell us a bridge (real or
imagined). I can assure you that you will be given short shrift.
[ Contents ]
Appendix
A. About the Author.
I spent 6 years in the organisation, firstly as a public
Scientologist and later as a Sea Org crew member. I was trained at the
Flag Land Base in Clearwater, Florida to Level VI auditor and was
processed to New OT V. Since leaving Scientology I have been able to
put my life back in shape (a feat which is impossible according to
`church' propaganda) and am now completely disaffected with the
organisation which I am convinced is a shameless fraud.
I believe, nevertheless, in the right of people to follow the
religion of their choice, and leave when they like, without pressure.
I also think that they should be allowed to get the less palatable
facts before becoming involved. After all, it was Hubbard who said,
"Honesty opens the door to case gain." (Ref: HCOB 1 May 1985)
[ Contents ]
B. Scientology associations.
- Association for Better Living and Education (ABLE). A `PR'
organisation.
- Narconon. Drug rehabilitation centres.
- Criminon. Prisoner rehabilitation.
- Applied Scholastics. Schools and Education programs.
- World Institute of Scientology Enterprises (WISE). Approaches
business community.
[ Contents ]
C. References used in this essay.
- HCOB.
- Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin. These are
individually dated technical issues.
- HCOPL.
- Hubbard Communications Office Policy
Letter. Individually dated admin. issues.
- Abil.
- Ability magazine. These are early Dianetics and
Scientology issues.
- SHSBC-XXX.
- Saint Hill Special Briefing Course, lecture
cassette tape number XXX.
[ Contents ]
D. Further reading.
- L. Ron Hubbard: Messiah or madman?
- Bent Corydon and L. Ron Hubbard Jr, N.J. : L. Stuart, 1987.
Bare-faced Messiah: The True Story of L. Ron Hubbard
- Russell Miller, London: Joseph, 1987.
- Religion Inc.: The Church of Scientology
- Stewart Lamont, London : Harrap, 1986.
- A Piece of Blue Sky: Scientology, Dianetics and L. Ron Hubbard Exposed
- Jon Atack, N.Y., N.J. : Carol, 1990.
- Cult Controversies: The Societal Response to New Religions
- James A Beckford, London, N.Y. : Tavistock, 1985.
- Enquiry into the Practice and Effects of Scientology: Report
- Sir John G. Foster, London : H.M.S.O, 1971.
Copyright David J. Carter November 1995. May be reproduced so long
as it is kept in its entirity and not edited. David J. Carter homepage; e-mail: carterd@iccu6.ipswichcity.qld.gov.au.
|