Kobrin objects only to OT 7
(KS-31)
There are three of such e-mails, to my knowledge:
From Helena Kobrin <hkk@netcom.com> Thu Nov 09 07:50:48 1995
Received: from mail.gld.bart.nl by mrsempel.bart.nl (IMAIL-95.02.01)
id PA00580; Thu Nov 09 07:50:48 1995
From mail.gld.bart.nl Thu Nov 09 07:50:45 1995
Received: from netcom11.netcom.com (netcom11.netcom.com [192.100.81.121])
by unix1.bART.nl (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA29627 for
<mrsempel@bart.nl>; Thu, 9 Nov 1995 02:00:44 +0100
Received: by netcom11.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
id QAA06065; Wed, 8 Nov 1995 16:55:04 -0800
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 16:55:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Helena Kobrin <hkk@netcom.com>
Sender: Helena Kobrin <hkk@netcom.com>
Reply-To: Helena Kobrin <hkk@netcom.com>
Subject: unauthorized posting of copyright and trade secret materials
To: mrsempel@bart.nl
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9511081603.A25267-0100000@netcom19>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Resent-From: "Marco R. Sempel" <mrsempel@bart.nl>
Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 95 01:17:25 EST
Resent-To: kspaink@xs4all.nl
Dear Mr. Sempel:
I represent Religious Technology Center ("RTC"), the
owner of the confidential Advanced Technology of the religion
of Scientology, and the holder of the exclusive rights under
the copyrights applicable to the Advanced Technology
materials. Among these copyrighted and confidential
materials are the Advanced Technology materials of a level
known as "OT VII." The copyright for OT VII is registered
with the United States Copyright Office under No.
TXU-303-388.
I have been informed that you have posted on
a web site a portion of the OT VII materials
without the authorization of my client, who, of course, would
not have given such authorization had it been requested.
Your action violates my client's legal rights in that it is
the unauthorized making of an electronic copy of the
copyrighted material and the unauthorized disclosure of trade
secrets materials.
These actions constitute violations of applicable
copyright laws and trade secret misappropriation entitling
our client to damages and an injunction. This is true
regardless of whether you ever signed an agreement with
respect to the confidentiality of the OT materials. You are
on notice that they are regarded as trade secrets, and case
law from several jurisdictions holds that an individual who
is on notice is liable for trade secret misappropriation.
Sincerely,
Helena K. Kobrin
*****
X-Sender: keesb@pop.dataweb.nl
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 13:54:23 +0100
To: kspaink@xs4all.nl
From: keesb@dataweb.nl (kees vd berg)
Subject: HKK posting 8/11 met header
X-POP3-Rcpt: keesb@clausplein
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 16:37:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Helena Kobrin <hkk@netcom.com>
Subject: unauthorized posting of copyright and trade secret materials
To: keesb@dataweb.nl
MIME-Version: 1.0
Dear Keesb@dataweb.nl:
I represent Religious Technology Center ("RTC"), the
owner of the confidential Advanced Technology of the religion
of Scientology, and the holder of the exclusive rights under
the copyrights applicable to the Advanced Technology
materials. Among these copyrighted and confidential
materials are the Advanced Technology materials of a level
known as "OT VII." The copyright for OT VII is registered
with the United States Copyright Office under No.
TXU-303-388.
I have been informed that you have posted on
a web site a portion of the OT VII materials
without the authorization of my client, who, of course, would
not have given such authorization had it been requested.
Your action violates my client's legal rights in that it is
the unauthorized making of an electronic copy of the
copyrighted material and the unauthorized disclosure of trade
secrets materials.
These actions constitute violations of applicable
copyright laws and trade secret misappropriation entitling
our client to damages and an injunction. This is true
regardless of whether you ever signed an agreement with
respect to the confidentiality of the OT materials. You are
on notice that they are regarded as trade secrets, and case
law from several jurisdictions holds that an individual who
is on notice is liable for trade secret misappropriation.
Sincerely,
Helena K. Kobrin
*****
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 10:24:19 +0000 (GMT)
From: andrew cooke <A.Cooke@roe.ac.uk>
To: Karin Spaink <kspaink@xs4all.nl>
Subject: OTVII unlinked
hi,
finally received a letter about the fishman stuff - only
concerning OTVII. i have replaced the link to that item with
a link to the letter. otherwise, the pages remain as before.
copy of letter included below.
andrew
work phone/fax: 0131 668 8356, office: 0131 668 8357
institute for astronomy, royal observatory, blackford hill, edinburgh
http://www.roe.ac.uk/ajcwww
From hkk@netcom.comThu Nov 9 10:18:33 1995
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 16:46:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Helena Kobrin <hkk@netcom.com>
To: a.cooke@roe.ac.uk
Subject: unauthorized posting of copyright and trade secret materials
Dear Mr. Cooke:
I represent Religious Technology Center ("RTC"), the
owner of the confidential Advanced Technology of the religion
of Scientology, and the holder of the exclusive rights under
the copyrights applicable to the Advanced Technology
materials. Among these copyrighted and confidential
materials are the Advanced Technology materials of a level
known as "OT VII." The copyright for OT VII is registered
with the United States Copyright Office under No.
TXU-303-388.
I have been informed that you have posted on
a web site a portion of the OT VII materials
without the authorization of my client, who, of course, would
not have given such authorization had it been requested.
Your action violates my client's legal rights in that it is
the unauthorized making of an electronic copy of the
copyrighted material and the unauthorized disclosure of trade
secrets materials.
These actions constitute violations of applicable
copyright laws and trade secret misappropriation entitling
our client to damages and an injunction. This is true
regardless of whether you ever signed an agreement with
respect to the confidentiality of the OT materials. You are
on notice that they are regarded as trade secrets, and case
law from several jurisdictions holds that an individual who
is on notice is liable for trade secret misappropriation.
Sincerely,
Helena K. Kobrin
|
