Scientology
Critics' | |
Scientology Criticism | Human Rights Abuses |
Inside Scientology | The Belief System |
Scientology in Trouble | What you can do |
UK Focus | UK Media Archive |
Scientology Webring: Next Previous Random Next-5 List
Scientology is the
pseudo-scientific belief
system created by American writer L. Ron Hubbard. It has built
up a huge multinational network of corporations, including the
Office of Special Affairs -the world's largest private intelligence
agency. Based in California, it has a presence in most major cities
in the UK, as well as other countries.
It recruits through its
free personality tests, via the book "Dianetics" and
via more subtle schemes such as management courses and drug rehabilitation centres.
Initiates are presented with some scientific-sounding courses
and principles to help them deal with life, but after years of
commitment and tens of thousands of pounds, they may find themselves
paying to have alien spirits exorcised from their body or signing
a billion-year contract to save this "dying world".
Critics of Scientology object mainly to the activities of the
organisations, rather than the beliefs of individual members.
Scientology's eventual aim is to seize control
of media and government and so to run the world according to Hubbard's
principles. Society's problems would
then be solved by removing the "suppressive
people" from society, by quarantining or extermination.
Scientology was created by a science-fiction
writer, and
appropriately enough, its belief system includes a galactic empire and
space aliens
blowing each other up. The "OT3" document, which includes these
claims, is only given to followers who have gone through sufficient
indoctrination and given enough money or labour.
The Scientology organisations do not want
"raw meat" (that's you and I) to be told about the higher levels
of the belief system, as Fishman's press release
explains.
Now read on for the stories and
documents that they don't want you to read.
Timeline of Scientology's
Harassment of Internet users in 1995.
Rod Keller's review
of the week summarises the latest revelations.
Martin Hunt's Acronym FAQ
explains the jargon used by scientologists and their critics.
The pages you are reading now use a minimum of
graphics, for the benefit of people with slow connections. If you like
pictures, take a look at Scientologists in
their uniforms, a tour of
the Saint Hill headquarters or a picket in Tottenham
Court Road. If you have a RealAudio player and don't mind a 2.8
Meg download, here are soundtracks from two British documentaries on
Scientology, from 1995 and
1996.
Information on Scientology
celebrities and their influence in Hollywood from Tilman
Hausherr.
In fairness, here are are the links to the
official sites for Dianetics and
Scientology.
I'm not expecting them to link to this page any
time soon.
Books and Pamphlets in hypertext format: Jon Atack's The Total Freedom Trap is a very readable summary of the truth about Scientology, Dianetics and L. Ron Hubbard. Bob Penny's Social Control in Scientology describes how individuals are pressured to give up independent thought. Margery Wakefield's The Road to Xenu is a detailed and emotional narrative account of life in the cult. Other such books can be found on the Suppressive Bookshelf.
Thanks to the many contributors to alt.religion.scientology
whose work I have used in this page. The newsgroup is still around,
despite the "Church" management's plan to
"handle" it.
Danger to your
mental health: Research carried out in 1982 suggests that
Scientology's mind-control
techniques are the most damaging of any major cult.
Danger to
your family relationships:
an example of how the cult's "disconnection" policy
breaks up families. The Bajaj family
lost their son.
Danger to your
children's health and sanity:
Dennis Erlich found out the hard way. Yolanda
Howell
told an equally disturbing story.
Danger to your bank
balance:
The total cost to reach Scientology's upper levels can be in the
hundreds of thousands. Just one level
can cost $45,000. A UK price list has also
been released.
Operation
Freakout:
Paulette Cooper wrote an expose of the cult. In response they
attempted to frame her for bomb threats. They had a highly detailed plan which almost worked.
Deception
Training: The CoS has trained some of its people to lie convincingly
in court.
PC Files:
Scientology auditing is used to extract personal confessions which are
then used to blackmail defectors.
Operation
Bulldozer Leak:
A sinister plan to infiltrate government and the media.
Wins in 1970: more
on the cult's "intelligence" activities.
Many more such documents are kept by Jeff Lee
Steven Fishman
gave a short affidavit about the attempts
to manipulate judges and key witnesses. Allegedly they even infiltrated
the office of the opposing attorney.
Hon. James M.
Ideman,
a US District Judge, wrote this complaint about the scientologists'
harassment.
Ex-scientologist Gerald
Armstrong describes abuse of the legal system.
Scientology's war
against
judges: this "church" spends a remarkable amount of time and
money in the courtroom.
In 1995, Scientology had to make the largest libel payout in Canadian history.
The court ruled that "Every aspect of this case demonstrates
the very real and persistent malice of Scientology."
The use of the courts to silence criticism
is going on right now: read Maureen Garde's Web page
for the latest.
A Search for
Answers:
An essay by Dennis Erlich (a critic
of whom the Co$ are particularly frightened) on the attraction
and danger of cults.
Fight
Against Coercive Tactics: a real mine of information on Scientology
and on psychological coercion.
The
American Family Foundation
maintains an excellent list of pro- and anti-cult links.
The Antidote to
Cult Recruitment is to be aware.
Research: A
Short Review of Academic Research into Cults.
Exploding the
Myths:
Some words of warning from a top UK cult expert.
Notice from the original author: As if it were not obvious, the articles archived at this site are meant only to reflect the opinions of their writers. These opinions are not necessarily shared by the author.
Permission to reproduce has not been sought for all the material at this site. Most of the articles here have been taken in good faith: I have assumed that those posting these documents to Usenet have acted within their rights. I have deliberately refrained from releasing material that I know to be the subject of legal disputes.
The original author of this page is Martin Poulter